Ehrenreich
skriver:
[T]he
only cure for bad science is more science, and the story of human evolution has
been evolving pretty rapidly itself. There were always plenty of prima facie
reasons to doubt the Mr. and Mrs. Man-the-Hunter version of our collective
biography, such as little matter of size, or, in sciencespeak, “sexual dimorphism.”
If men and women evolved so differently, then why aren't men a whole lot bigger
than they are? In fact, human display a smaller size disparity between the
sexes than do many of our ape cousins[den jämlika apan]-suggesting (though
not proving) that early men and women sometimes had overlapping job
descriptions, like having to drive off the leopards. And speaking of Paleolithic
predators, wouldn't it be at least unwise for the guys to go off hunting,
leaving the supposedly weak and dependent women and children to fend for themselves
at base camp? --- In what other carnivorous species is only one sex an actual
predator?1)
Fotnot:
1) Ehrenreich, “The real truth about the female body”, i Time, March
15, 1999:47.
~
Från boken Postmodernisme premillénaire.
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento