Non-Victorian Sex Education - Erotica

 

from my point of view

the man’s phallus is so simple in its structure, we get an erection, we have an orgasm, some men can get this over and over again, it’s more of a hard pumping machine of any kind

I feel fortunate on this subject

the man’s phallus can be of different sizes, some woman say this is important, some say it depends on the length, some resort more to the thickness, some argue that it is a myth and that it instead depends on technology

I feel fortunate on these subjects

but how you twist, turn and shake it, the man’s phallus and his whole physical pleasure process, is a simple factor

there is nothing we can do about it, here does not happiness and luck play a role

from my point of view

women’s pleasure fjord are so much more advanced in its physique, it requires more processing and precise touch, it will not be as easy excited, and if that happens, or when that happens, more is required for the next step to happen, wave after wave of ecstasy and orgasm

this I believe is all fine, complexity is a more advanced stage

from my point of view

woman is a different kind of creature than the man, she is the only one who can give life, for certain both are needed for this delicate system, but we men give just a splash whilst you must give your body and your life, at least a part of it, you are closer to the essence of life, we are only a part of its consequence. You carry the magic within you, hence some people regard you as being goddesses

this I believe is all fine, so that life is passed on

from my point of view

regardless of sacrality or not, because man’s physical pleasure organ is so simple and virtually guarenteed at its function, should the concentration be fully focused at achieving your pleasure, fore pleasure should we all reach. with basis in your more advanced physics, and according to some, sacrality, so must your complexity be hearken, variation could be a prerequisite for the continued reach of pleasure, to prevent routine, or just because you want attention and varied formations on our pole

Neither this do I contradict

from my point of view

I do not see that this would be a problem, why should it be? is not love a spiritual and mental sense, in which the highest pleasure and happiness of the beloved are the goals? limitations on the fulfillment of this, prevent love, and that would not be good

so I think it’s good, that love is put first, in the heart where it ought to be

from my point of view

justice has not with total equality, and distribution, to do, or that the means are the same, but rather that the results are the same

let the woman get, what she needs for pleasure

~

= Erotica